
MIX++® - software package implements new technique for the producing of the solid material blending. It has the potential to retrofit or completely substitute the most of techniques used nowadays.
MIX++® Benefits:
Technological processing equipment is usually designed for a specific quality of input materials (like raw materials, primary products etc.). But there is also another (and usually forgotten) requirement:
The fluctuation of quality features should be kept as minimal as possible.
Those variations are sometimes crucial for the stability of the technological process itself. Fluctuations of input quality could lead to increased costs, derogation of produced quality and even a stoppage in the production cycle.
Although some very sophisticated mixing methods were already invented and implemented, the problem of the input quality variations still concerns the engineering department. The techniques, used nowadays for the mixing of solid materials are all too often time, energy and resource intensive.

MIX++® - software package implements new technique for the producing of the solid material blending. It has the potential to retrofit or completely substitute the most of techniques used nowadays.
MIX++® Benefits:
MIX++® Features:
![]() |
![]() |
|
| MIX++® Input: | ![]() |
MIX++® Output: |
| measurements prescribed blend qualities (optional) | percentage amounts of components in a blend minimal fluctuations of the quality |
The costs of the MIX++® implementation in an existing production environment are relatively small, due to the possibility of the step-by-step implementation.

PROBLEM
The fluctuations of the coal calorific value should be minimized before the combustion.The combustion plant could use three different types of coal (A, B and C). The calorific values of the representative samples have been examined in a lab and are presented ni the following table:
| Type | Calorific value [kJ/kg] |
||
|
Sample No. 1 |
Sample No. 2 |
Sample No. 3 |
|
| A | 6700 | 6490 | 6910 |
| B | 8375 | 8090 | 8650 |
| C | 7535 | 7765 | 7305 |
This fluctuation should be minimized through achieving an optimal mixture of this components. The mean calorific value of the mixture should be 7830 kJ/kg.
SOLUTION
All the measurements and constraints listed above are entered in the MIX++® application. The following table shows percentage ratios of components in mixture, as well as mean values and standard deviations ( Sn-1 ) of all components in comparison to the mixture, as obtained from a successfully finished computation:
| Type |
mean calorific value
[kJ/kg] |
stand. deviation Sn-1 [kJ/kg] |
percentage [%] |
| A | 6700.0 |
210.0 | 12.25 |
| B | 8371.7 | 280.0 | 47.48 |
| C | 7535.0 | 230.0 | 40.27 |
|
Mixture (MIX) |
7830.0 |
164.07 |
100.00 |
The following probability distribution diagram is constructed under the assumption that calorific value of the components is distributed according to normal Gaussian distribution:

Calorific value - probability distribution diagram
As these diagrams reveal, the standard deviation of the mixture is considerably smaller then the standard deviation of any of the components in the mixture.